Islamic
ideology and its formative influence on education in contemporary Iran
Hossein Godazgar*
Abstract
Despite the ridiculous claims on the demise of
religion in human beings’ everyday life in the shrunk modern world, its
continuous and significant role has been considerable in forming new social
forms correspondent to Islamic requirements since Islamic revolution of 1979.
The undeniable role of Islamic ideology, however, has already been proved by
the Constitutional Revolution (1905-1911), nationalization movement
(1951-1952), the uprising of 1963 and finally the appearance of Islamic
Revolution (1978-1979) after all attempts made under the Pahlavi dynasty
towards modernization, westernisation and secularisation of the country during last century.
The main aim
is to explore the influence of ideas and values on the development of social
structures and processes. In order to examine the degree to which these
ideational factors influenced Iranian post-revolutionary educational system, I
conducted two fieldworks in a rural area of North Western Iran based on
ethnographic study of religion and everyday life in 1995-1996. The focus of
this paper will be the study of changes that have occurred in school curricula
since 1979. According to findings, the effects of the Islamic Revolution on
curricula and textbooks represent a particular interesting compromise between
aspects of tradition and aspects of modernity.
Keywords: Islam, education, contemporary Iran, ideology and
values.
Resumen
El principal objetivo de este artículo es explorar la
influencia de las ideas y los valores religiosos en el desarrollo de las
estructuras y los procesos sociales ocurridos en Irán a partir de la revolución
islámica de 1979. Con el propósito de examinar el grado en que estos factores
ideológicos han influido en el sistema educativo del Irán posrevolucionario,
llevé a cabo dos periodos de trabajo de campo en una zona rural del
noroccidente de Irán, enmarcados en un estudio etnográfico sobre la religión y
la vida cotidiana durante 1995 y 1996. Este artículo hace énfasis en el estudio
de los cambios ocurridos en el currículum escolar a partir de 1979. De acuerdo
con los hallazgos, el efecto de la Revolución Islámica en el currículum y en
los libros de texto representa un compromiso interesante entre aspectos
tradicionales y aspectos modernos.
Palabras clave:
Islam, educación, Irán contemporáneo, ideología y
valores.
* The University of Tabriz, Irán.
Correo-e:
Godazgar@tabrizu.ac.ir
1. Introduction
The focus of this paper will be on the changes that
have occurred in school curricula since 1979. The dominant theme running
through the paper will be the ideological pressure to make curricula conform
with the new Islamic philosophy of education. Before this theme can be analysed, however, it is necessary to give a very brief
account of the research methods employed in the collection of information about
Iranian schools.
Most
of the information on which the following analysis of curricular changes is
based was collected in a rural area of North Western Iran based on an
ethnographic study of religion and everyday life in 1995-1996. Although I used
ethnographic methods in order to capture the meaning of everyday human
activities and adequately understand social processes, I also drew upon
questionnaires, interviews, life histories, and documents about the changes
that had occurred over the previous twenty years.
2.
Textbooks and Curricula
The institution of education is based on state
policies and supervision over what is taught, who is taught, and who teaches
both males and females. In most modern societies, educational policies are
designed to cultivate those human resources which governments deem necessary or
desirable. In contrast to the educational policies of most developed and developing
countries, which concentrate on training workers, Iranian educational policy
placed more emphasis on the need for training religiously committed, socially
responsible and faithful men and women who support the Islamic government.
Although,
because of the Islamic Revolution of 1979, the state-provided textbooks were
altered in some ways, specifically in the area of humanities, these changes
were the same for both girls and boys. Although the changes in curriculum and
textbooks are supposed to be scientific in some aspects, nobody can ignore the
process of politicisation and Islamisation
of the whole curriculum, which has been going on since 1979.
After
the revolution, major changes occurred in the areas of Humanities and Social
Economics, with some courses attracting more attention than others. The courses
of history, philosophy, Arabic literature, Islamic education, and to some extent the courses of geography and Persian literature were considered the most suitable fields within which
the political ideology of the Islamic Republic could be cultivated. I give you
some examples:
2.1 History courses
In history courses after the revolution, the study of pre-Islamic Iran was replaced with the
history of Islam, although a brief history of the Prophet had been taught
during the pre-revolutionary period. Moreover, the course of contemporary
history was
taught completely differently in the Pahlavi period. Furthermore, because of
the revolution, the size of the history textbook increased by about one-third, and is being
increased further each year. In addition to the increase of the history
textbook’s size, the time allocated to the course has also been increased.
According to my informants, in the post-revolutionary educational system,
teaching and learning history became one of the most important subjects of all the
academic branches. This may have happened due to the specific attention which
the Qur’an pays to the role of history as the main resource for learning from
the fate of past communities and tribes.
2.2 Philosophy
The curriculum of philosophy for humanities students
in the present educational system of Iran is more generic than it was before
the revolution (see Siasi 1975 and Abu-talibi 1994; and Appendix). This refers to human knowledge
or ideas about what is the place of human beings in the world and what is
valuable in life in the view of Islam, or of those ancient Greek philosophers
not considered inconsistent with Islam. This is in contrast to philosophy
courses taught in the West, which tend to ask old questions by means of new
procedures related to recent social phenomena. Rather, the philosophy course in
modern Iran is designed to restore the ‘pride of Iranian intellectualism’
(which existed for centuries) by perpetuating the Islamic philosophical
disciplines (hikmat-e eslami) (see Rahman 1982: 35;
104-9). A pre-revolutionary philosophy textbook, which only contained
discussions of Western philosophy, was replaced by two different books entitled
Philosophy
and Acquaintance
With Islamic Philosophy. The 59-page textbook of philosophy for third year
students of humanities contains topics related to the meaning and the realm of
philosophy, and the ideas of the early philosophers Socrates, Plato and
Aristotle. The 156-page textbook ‘Acquaintance With Islamic Philosophy’, which
is given exclusively to Year-twelve students of humanities, is similar in
content to theology.
2.3 Arabic literature
Arabic literature, apart from the course of English
Literature as a Western symbol, received special attention as a sacred
phenomenon after the Islamic Revolution of 1979. Learning Arabic Literature was
required of humanities students before the revolution because of its specific
influence on Persian literature in post-Islam Iran, but in the post-revolutionary
educational system of Iran, because Arabic was the language of revelation and
the Qur’an, it became a mandatory course in all subjects for all years from the
guidance level to the end of high school (see Khazaei
1971; Refa’at 1993; and Appendix). Although the Islamic Republic
used the Constitution to get all Iranians to learn Arabic, the educational
system was too weak to put this into practice. However, the use of Arabic terms
in administrative letters, and teaching Arabic literature in traditional religious
schools as well as the modern schools were taken as signs of increased
religiosity. The importance of Arabic is being increased by the authorities
year by year so that the textbook’s size has doubled and two hours per week
have been added to the Arabic literature schedule at high school since 1993.
2.4 Religious education
The greatest changes in textbooks probably occurred in
the subject of Religious Education. The pre-revolutionary title of Religious
Education was changed to Islamic Education after the Islamic revolution, except
in year-twelve (or year-four of the high-school) which kept its old title until
about 1990. However, the contents were Islamic during both regimes (see Shoar 1968; Sadat 1993; and Appendix). Besides the dramatic changes in
the content of the textbooks, almost all pre-revolutionary religious education
teachers were replaced by new teachers, from any subject of study, who were
loyal to the Islamic values. Since religious education enjoyed less importance
than courses of art and handwriting during the Shah’s period, whichever
teachers could not teach the main courses were appointed to teach religious
education –even if they had no religious beliefs. After the revolution,
however, religious education was taken more seriously at schools. According to
a teacher of Islamic Education, while moral issues formed the bulk of religious
teachings before the revolution, post-revolutionary Islamic education textbooks
contained the Islamic world view and ideology –to protect the young revolutionary
generation from both Western and Eastern ideologies, especially Marxism, due to
the high level of activity of different leftist groups in the early years of
the revolution.
2.5 Extra-curricula
activities
One of the educational areas which became very active
in a different way was Omur-e-tarbiati
(extra-curricula activities). This area’s activity
during the reign of the Shah was restricted to the establishment of morning
ceremonies (assemblies) at schools and the registration of some students as the
Corps Students Danesh-amuzan-e Pish-ahang who
attended demonstrations on public holidays during the Shah’s regime and who
dealt with artistic jobs such as painting, handwriting, poetry and fictional
writing. After the Islamic revolution of 1979, the institution expanded its
activity to establishing Islamic revolutionary values in schools, and was
eventually changed to Moral Education. However, it retained its title of omur-e tarbiati.
Apart from initiating morning ceremonies in which Qur’anic
verses were read instead of a song for the Shah, Moral Education called
students to attend noon prayers at school with a clergyman who had been
appointed by the local education Authority (lea)
as an Imam-e Jama’at. Competitions to recite the Qur’an, Nahjo’l-balagheh (the collection of Imam Ali’s letters and
speeches) and to sing revolutionary songs were added to those of calligraphy,
painting, theatre, book reading, poetry and story writing. At the guidance
level, Moral Education had entered the year-six national curriculum, replacing
English literature after 1986-87, and it benefited from having a formal
textbook in all years of the guidance level from 1988-89 onwards. Its timetable
for year-six was two hours per week, and for the other two guidance-level years
was one hour per week. There was no systematic curriculum to teach pupils, and
the lessons were mostly epistemological in the first years after 1986-87; but
now most lessons have moral aspects.
2.6 Geography course
As for the course on Geography, although some teachers
of the subject told me that most changes in this area after the revolution were
because of new scientific findings, changes have been towards more human
geography than physical, including geomorphology and climatology. However,
nobody can ignore the impact of the ruling political ideology on the textbooks’
titles and their contents. After the revolution, a textbook called The Geography of Muslim Countries
was added to the national textbooks at high school level. However, this
textbook was eliminated from the national textbooks provided for the New System
of education in 1992, and another textbook called Political and Economic Geography
replaced it. A section on political geography was added for the New System, in
order to familiarize the students with politics. Moreover, another textbook
called The
Geography of Continents was omitted from the series of textbooks provided for
the New System of education by the government, while the textbook of General Geography was almost
unaltered. Concerning the Geography
of Iran textbook, the section on Natural Geography remained
almost the same, while a section on Human Geography was completely changed
after the revolution.
2.7 Persian literature
In the field of Persian Literature, the biggest change
after the revolution was in the academic subjects of Humanities and Social
Economy, where there were increases in the size of textbooks and schedule, and
changes in the content of the textbooks (see BPET 1976; BPET 1991; and Appendix). According to a teacher of
Persian literature, the timetable for Humanities and Social Economy subjects
increased from four hours per week before the revolution to six hours, for
years one to three, and to eight hours for year-twelve after the revolution.
The timetable schedule remained the same, four hours per week, for the academic
branches of Experimental Sciences (ulum-e tajrobi)
and Math-Physics (riazi-fizik), and the
changes in content were negligible. However, as was suggested to me by some
teachers of Persian literature, the time devoted to literature was reduced from
six to four hours per week for years one to three, for a while, by establishing
the vocational programme of ‘Tarh-e
Kad’ in 1982.
In
the opinion of the teachers of Persian literature, the content of
post-revolutionary textbooks was totally different from pre-revolutionary ones.
One of them believed that the literature in the Shah’s period imposed blind
obedience to the West in students’ brains in any possible way, and that the
students thought that ‘there was another world in the West to which they should
have access’. He maintained that ‘in the
literature of the textbook of the White Revolution, the Shah
appeared as the manifestation of God’s will’. But after the 1979 revolution, in
his view, literature was presented in Islamic form. ‘Students understood that
there were self-made and honourable people in the
country who could influence the country’s fate, as became clear in the War’, he
said to me. He implicitly admitted that daily political issues affect Persian
literature: ‘since nowadays the issue of cultural invasion (tahajom-e farhangi) is an important one, everything in society is ready to
contend against it, including the textbooks in general and particularly through
the mass media and journals’.
2.8 Humanities and social sciences
Among courses on humanities and social sciences, some
were changed less than others mentioned above, in terms of timetable schedule,
the size of textbooks or their contents. The impact of religious and political
ideology on the content of social sciences or sociology textbooks was greater
than on other courses (see Nezami-Taleshi 1978; Tajgaram and Qandi 1979; and Appendix). For instance, the time allotted
to sociology since the revolution has been dramatically reduced from thirteen
hours per week for all years at high school until 1992-93, to just four hours
under the New System of education. Moreover, the pre-revolutionary textbook
title of Sociology
changed to Social
Sciences for all textbooks, for all students in humanities as
well as in Social Economic subjects, except the year-twelve textbook, which
kept the title of Sociology.
The same happened in the departments of sociology at all universities in
post-revolutionary Iran.
2.9 Economics
Regarding Economics, it should be noted that the four
pre-revolutionary academic subjects of study of Social Economics (eqtesad-e ejtemaei),
Humanities (ulum-e ensani), Experimental Sciences and Math-Physics continued
after the revolution until about 1993. After that date, the first two subjects
were combined to form a separate academic subject of Literature and Humanities
which, in the view of my informants, was more about humanities than economics.
In the same way, the earlier textbooks of Islamic Economics and Economic Growth and Development in
year-twelve were replaced by just one textbook called ‘Iranian Economy’ in the
same year. According to a teacher of economics, the content of the latter book
was more realistic than the former, because although the textbook of Islamic Economics presented
economic arguments from the Islamic point of view and the textbook of Economic Growth and Development
had discussions of political economy, the new textbook included the present-day
economic problems of Iran: electricity, population growth, opec, the economic value of oil
etc. The creation of an Islamic
Economics textbook was in fact one of greatest impacts of
Islamic ideology on social sciences after the revolution.
2.10 Biology, botany and geology
Regarding biology, botany and geology, the textbooks
had progressed and developed gradually since 1970. Comparing the pre- and post-revolutionary timetable for these
subjects, the time given to them increased after the revolution. For example,
year-twelve students had eight hours a week for these courses between 1970
and 1975. Then, by eliminating the section on Botany from the Biology textbook and the section on
Evolution from the Geology
textbook, the hours were reduced to six by 1978. But after 1978, by increasing
the Biology hours from four to six and a half, re-establishing the Botany
course for two hours a week, and increasing Geology from two to three hours,
the time devoted to these subjects in the weekly timetable almost doubled.
A
biology teacher, confirming the reflection of recent findings in science on the
textbooks, also admitted that the ruling Islamic ideology had had an effect on
the content of the textbooks. He, who had taught science at guidance level both
before and after the revolution, believed that the pre-revolutionary textbook
of Science was different from the post-revolutionary textbook, in which science
is related to God and the knowledge of Him, and that this issue is mentioned
wherever possible in the textbooks. In the early years of the revolution, he
claimed, there had been some contradictions between the courses of Islamic
Education, on the one hand, and biology or geology, on the other. While the
science textbooks, according to the theory of Evolution, introduced monkeys as
predecessors of mankind, the religious textbooks –trying to indicate the theory
of Evolution or the ideas of Darwin as just a theory and not necessarily a
matter of fact introduced Adam and Eve as the first humans. According to this
teacher, since 1984 there have been some attempts to reduce sensitivities
towards such theories: ‘for example, the name of Darwin was omitted from
textbooks. Alternatively, his work was presented as “the theory of Evolution”
or as “cause and effect”, “the interaction of natural and human factors” or
“the process of interaction between living things and non-living things”. It
was interesting that besides the increase in time for studying biology in the
weekly timetable, for the first time, there was a separate laboratory hour in
the schedule. Regarding the courses of Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics,
there has been no major change in their contents or schedule, as it was
expected.
2.11 Physical education
Regarding the course of Physical Education (pe), unlike in
the early years after the revolution, sport and pe were now taken into consideration.
Some aspects of pe
became now even more organised than they had been in
the Shah’s period. For example, according to the new regulations of refereeing,
a referee had the right to give an offending player a red card at school level.
When asked whether there were differences between girls and boys schools in
terms of pe
curriculum, I was suggested that since 1985 handball had been added to the
pre-revolutionary pe
curricula of basketball, volleyball, football, table tennis and running at the
boys’ schools of that area. There had been no textbook about pe courses
either before or after the revolution. The number of matches between different
classes and schools of boys had increased since the mid-1980s, even in
comparison with before the revolution, according to my informants. However, all
matches at school and class level were stopped by the authorities in 1995 as a
result of another policy, through which the Physical Education Organisation (sazman-e tarbiat-e badani) dealt directly with the selection of some skilled
youths in order to attend provincial matches.
A
female pe
teacher confirmed that there was no special textbook available, due to lack of
resources in her view, for the pe curriculum, and that girls’ curricula and
assessments were different from boys’. She made clear to me that there were no
martial arts at girls schools, but that their main courses were: volleyball,
chess, basketball, badminton and table tennis. According to this teacher, the
games common to boys and girls were: volleyball, chess, handball and
basketball. However, there was no facility, or perhaps possibility, for
basketball at the girls school in which she worked.
3. Libraries
An open atmosphere was not available for Iranian
students and teachers to study different science books. The textbooks required
by students and teachers were provided by the Iranian government, in both pre-
and post-revolutionary regimes. The importance of libraries had always been
hidden from Iranian society. Since Iranian students did not become properly
familiar with the idea of book-reading and libraries, and were guided by
state-provided textbooks and teachers from the early years of their education,
they expected their lecturers to provide something for them to read and to help
them pass higher education exams as well. As a result, libraries were rarely
considered by students, if Iranian schools had them at all. It was interesting
that when I asked teachers about the use of libraries by students, they
replied: ‘If they [students] study their own textbooks, that is good enough.
There is no need to go to libraries to read other books’.
Because
of the revolution of 1979, the schools’ libraries, at least in the studied
area, became active, but only in the special field of religion. Some teachers
from different academic subjects enthusiastically looked for some Islamic
books, so they could become familiar with the new interpretation of Islam, in
the very early years of the revolution. However, such enthusiasm did not last
long. In my view, the existence of such enthusiasm was not surprising, in a
secular society which was experiencing a new interpretation of an old religion.
For this reason, I agree with the opinion of some writers who believe that the
Iranian revolution of 1979 was political, as well as religious. If it had been
religious alone, it would have been the continuation of earlier Islamic
movements, and there would have been no place for enthusiasm in understanding
something which people already knew. Nevertheless, this enthusiasm was noticeable
among both students and some teachers at schools during the first years of the
revolution.
After
the revolution of 1979, although both schools’ and cities’ public libraries
were expanded, they developed specifically in the area of religious books. Regarding
town and city libraries, there was no considerable increase in the number of
scientific or practical books, even about Persian literature. The same was true
for school libraries after the revolution, although most schools had no library
at all before the revolution, as two teachers remarked. As I observed myself,
-and five teachers confirmed- there were no books relevant to their subjects of
studies, other than religious books, in the libraries of either boys’ or girls’
schools. However, there were far fewer books in girls’ high schools than in
boys’ schools, according to my own observation. During my six months fieldwork
in all the schools of one area, except for a few pupils on one occasion in a
boys’ guidance school, I never saw anybody
use these libraries. Except for a few scientific books, which were
described by the relevant teachers as useless, all the other books were
religious and had been written by ulama who were
loyal to the Islamic ideology of the revolution. In this regard, an educational
official suggested: ‘the role of libraries (in schools) is that the ruling
ideas should reach the students through the libraries. The lea has sent schools some books two or
three times, all of which were religious books, except a few scientific books
which are almost useless.’
I investigated the New System of education in the
new branch of Kar-Danesh at a
Vocational High School in a city close to the rural area, because there was no
vocational high school in the rural area. Since this school employed a librarian
and was well organised, I was able to acquire some
statistics about the stock. Among the 3550 books at that school, there were
about 2000 (56%) books on religion, about 200 (6%) books on different aspects
of science studied at the school, about 500 (14%) historical and fictional
books, about 20 (less than 1%) volumes on sport, about 30 (22%) volumes of
religious and gnostic poems and about 800 (22%) books
which the librarian called ‘miscellaneous’. I then investigated students’
visits to the library for their own needs over a period of about two months. In
this vocational high school, of 481 visits to the library, 141 (29%) inquiries
had been for religious books, 69 (14%) for books which met pupils’ scientific
needs and the other visits were for other titles. It should be noted that these
inquiries were made by the male students of the vocational branch, not the
students of the branch of ‘Kar-Danesh’. Moreover,
according to the head teacher of the vocational high school, most of the
scientific books had been provided recently because of the special attention
paid to scientific books and experiments by the New System of education. This
could be confirmed by comparing the data regarding inquiries made by students
of the New System and the Old System. Out of the 481 inquiries, 379 (78%) cases
were related to the New System of education and 102 (22%) cases were from
students of the Old System of education. Moreover, while in the New System
there were twice as many references to religious books as to scientific books
(107 against 57), in the Old System of education there were three times as many
(34 against 12). Furthermore, according to the librarian of the school, the
students in the New System used the library more than the students in the Old
System. I was told by some educational authorities that the role of the teacher
of moral education and his activities were very important in all schools. As an
example of a vocational school in a city in which the New System of education
had led to shifts in scientific views, such statistics hint at the situation of
schools’ libraries in rural areas.
As
regards town and city public libraries, I have to mention that apart from the
problem of insufficient science books, which also affected schools’ libraries,
there were specific difficulties in terms of gender, which did not exist in the
sex-segregated schools of Iran. As expected, the situation for girls wanting to
use a town’s public library was more problematic than it was in the city.
Unlike the city girls, girls in the town even encountered problems in borrowing
books. However, some teachers who were natives of the region believed that the
number of female students who used the library for borrowing was very slowly
increasing at that time, in comparison with the early years of the library’s
establishment (1992). Out of twelve teachers, some of whom were natives,
confirmed that the girls of that town were more or less deprived of using the
library, because of its remote location in the town and their families’ disagreement
with the girls’ use of it. Unlike boys, the female students of the New System
of education were taken to visit the public library by the female advisor of
the New System in that school, which could be interpreted as evidence of
deprivation of library use by girls’ families. Moreover, two female teachers
and the school’s head teacher stated that girls had borrowed books from the
public library through the school, but either the school’s authorities or the
girls’ teacher had returned the borrowed books. Furthermore, a male native
teacher remarked that the girls in the village used their brothers, if they had
any, to borrow or return books for them. According to the twelve teachers
questioned, the families in the village were too biased culturally to allow
their daughters to go to such public places. Although the boys had greater
access to public places including libraries, they showed less interest in using
them than girls, according to several teachers.
When
I asked teachers about the possible reasons for students’ lack of interest in
reading books, and what they were interested in instead, they replied that the
direction of students’ interests had changed in recent years. Also, the
libraries lacked sufficient power to attract youths there. Regarding boys’ and
girls’ interests, some ideas seemed to be different from those of the first
decade after the revolution but remained similar to those of the
pre-revolutionary period.
4. Conclusion
Interpreting the changes that had occurred in
curricula and textbooks from a rather one-sided perspective, the impact of
Islamic ideology on these changes was considerable. The changes occurred in all
possible subjects of study including humanities and sciences. However, the
susceptibility of humanities subjects to the imposition of ideology was greater
than that of the sciences. Besides the changes required by religion, there have
also been some other creative changes required by science, although they had to
satisfy the religious requirements. To borrow a Weberian
approach to the analysis of these changes, Iran was still in a ‘rational’ mode
in so far as it was making attempts to increase domination over the external
world. Nonetheless, it is interesting that none of teachers in the areas of
science interpreted the increasing post-revolutionary attention to their areas
as religious requirements.
Appendix
A comparison of the contents of
some pre-revolutionary textbooks with those of their post-revolutionary
equivalents.
References
Abu-talibi, M.M. and A. Karimi, 1373 (1994), Ashenaei ba Falsafeh-ye
Eslami, baraye Sal-e Chaharom-e Motavasseteh, Adabiyat va Ulum-e
Ensani (Acquaintance with Islamic
Philosophy for year-twelve Humanities Pupils), Ministry of Education, Tehran.
bpet (daftar-e barnameh-rizi va ta’alif-e ketab-haye
darsi [Bureau for Planning and Editing
Textbooks]), 1355 (1976), Taarikh-e Adabiyat baraye Sal-e Sheshom-e Adabi (History of [Persian] Literature for year-twelve
Humanities Pupils), Ministry of Education, Tehran.
bpet (daftar-e barnameh-rizi va ta’alif-e ketab-haye
darsi [Bureau for Planning and Editing
Textbooks]), 1370 (1991), Taarikh-e Adabiyat baraye Sal-e Chaharom-e Farhang va Adab
(History of [Persian] Literature for Year-twelve Humanities Pupils), Ministry
of Education, Tehran.
Khazaei, M. et al., 1350 (1971), Arabi baraye Sal-e Panjom-e Adabi
(Arabic Literature for year-eleven Humanities Pupils), Ministry of Education,
Tehran.
Nezami-Taleshi, M., 1357
(1978), Jama’a-shenasi-e Sal-e Avval-e Dabiristan
(Sociology for year-nine Pupils), Ministry of Education, Tehran.
Rafa’at, et al., 1372 (1993), Arabi-e Sal-e Sevvom-e Dabiristan, Adabiyiat va Ulum-e Ensani
(Arabic Literature for year-eleven Humanities Pupils), Ministry of Education,
Tehran.
Rahman, F., 1982, Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual
Tradition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Sadat, M.A. et al., 1372 (1993), Binesh-e Eslami-e Sal-e Sevvom-e Dabiristan
(Islamic Education for year-eleven Pupils), Ministry of Education, Tehran.
Shoar, J. et al., 1347 (1968), Ta’limat-e Dini baraye
Sal-e Panjom-e Dabiristan
(Religious Education for Year-eleven Pupils), Ministry of Education, Tehran.
Siasi, A.A., 1354 (1975), Mabani-e Falsafeh baraye Sal-e Sheshom-e Adabi (Introductory Philosophy for year-twelve Humanities
Pupils), Ministry of Education, Tehran.
Tajgaram, M. and Qandi, F., 1358 (1979), Jama’a-shenasi-e Sal-e Avval-e Dabiristan
(Sociology for year-nine Pupils), Ministry of Education, Tehran.
Enviado: 19 de octubre de 2001
Aceptado: 19 de noviembre de 2001